According to our research, 60% of payers representing 48% of covered lives are expected to treat a biosimilar showing interchangeability similar to an originator brand, likely putting it on a preferred tier if the net price is competitive to the originator’s net price. In contrast, 25% of payers, representing 43% of covered lives, are expected to place the biosimilar on a higher or similar tier as the originator brand, assuming the net price is competitive to the originator. The remaining 15% of payers expect to make their tier placement decision based on the net price of the biosimilar. The majority of the decisions regarding rebate and net pricing were driven by PBMs, which represented at least half of the covered lives in our research.