Ask Indegene Icon

Ask Indegene (Beta)

Online
🧠 Building on our previous conversation...

Hello, how can I help you today?

You may type your question or choose from the options below:

Explore Solutions
Browse Insights
View Case Studies
Read Latest News
Explore Careers
Connect with an Expert
Please enter your full name
Please enter a valid work email
Please enter your message

Thank you!

We'll be in touch. In the meantime, feel free to keep exploring!

#PractitionerLevelConfidence

Indegene
Search Icon
5 Myths About Pharma Patient Experience – Busted!
Home
What we think
Blogs Pharma patient experience

5 Myths About Pharma Patient Experience – Busted!

Share this blog

Updated on : 08 Sep 2025

Consider this – 90% of patients want to self-manage their care leveraging technology1, there are currently more than 350,000 mobile health apps available2, and patient portals are expected to grow at an annual growth rate of 19% from 2023 to 20303. These numbers indicate that patients are no longer passive onlookers and have become active participants in taking control of their health. Consequently, pharma companies are looking at ways to refine their commercial models and engagement strategies to cater to these changes and deliver maximum value to patients. As they now tread this uphill journey toward patient centricity, several aspects of pharma patient experience remain obscure and have caused inaccurate assumptions among global pharma organizations.
In this article, we debunk some common myths about pharma patient experience.

Myth 1: Pharma companies are on top of their patient experience strategy

Compared to a few decades ago, pharma companies have made great strides in building new capabilities and bringing in new technologies to identify and cater to evolving patient needs. Yet, their ability to successfully deliver customized solutions that bolster a superior pharma patient experience leaves much to be desired.
In 2022, companies invested only 28.2% of their marketing budgets in pharma patient engagement, nearly half of what they spent on HCP engagement in the same year4. Their lackadaisical efforts are consistent with the poor performance of their initiatives. According to the State of Customer Experience survey by DT Consulting (An Indegene Company), patients rated pharma companies poorly, with a dismal score of 28 for their less-than-desirable experiences.

Myth 2: Pharma is nailing personalized content for patients

Content plays a vital role in how patients perceive the experience they receive from companies. And patients are keen to learn and seek information about their symptoms, disease, and treatment at different points in their treatment journeys.
This behavior gives pharma companies a tremendous opportunity to innovate and provide the necessary information that patients require via their preferred channels and at their convenience. But are pharma companies hitting the right notes? As per the survey by DT Consulting, although pharma companies are creating and delivering diverse types of content to patients, no type of content has been able to deliver a good or excellent experience. Insights from patient experience data reveal that patients judged most content types as merely fair.

Myth 3: Poor pharma patient experience has no impact on health outcomes

With 50% of chronic disease patients not complying with their physicians’ recommendations5, therapy non-adherence has a powerful impact on poor clinical outcomes.
Satisfied patients are easier to treat, more likely to follow their treatment plans, and better able to control their condition. Enhancing patient engagement solutions and delivering a holistic, personalized approach empowers patients to remain on their treatment plan and take charge of their health and well-being.
As depicted in the figure below, better quality interactions with patients drive them to make better health decisions and stay more involved in their treatment journey. This data is consistent with findings published in a BMJ Open systematic review, where researchers demonstrated a positive impact of pharma patient experience on clinical effectiveness and patient safety6.

Myth 4: Better treatment affordability = Superior pharma patient experience

Yes, affordability matters, but it’s not the only factor that shapes pharma patient experience. Understanding the various unique factors and providing tailored solutions at key inflection points can enable pharma companies to deliver a well-rounded experience and boost therapy compliance.
For example, a global pharma company was seeking to deliver a customized patient support program that would help strengthen patient centricity in pharma while improving outcomes for cancer patients.
As depicted in the figure below, we enabled several personalized solutions ranging from onsite enrollment support and financing solutions to adverse event support, medication delivery, and caregiver support that helped the company deliver value to 7,000+ cancer patients. This program also helped enhance therapy compliance that positively impacts health outcomes.

Myth 5: Pharma patient experience has no bearing on bottom line

This could not be further from the truth.
As per Salesforce’s State of the Connected Customer Report, 71% of consumers switched brands at least once in 2022, and 48% did so due to poor customer experience7. According to another report by McKinsey, across industries, successful projects for optimizing the customer experience typically achieve revenue growth of 5 to 10% and cost reductions of 15 to 25% within just 2–3 years8.
Poor pharma patient experience from therapy non-adherence alone has been shown to cost pharma companies US$375 billion per year10. Non-adherence leads to lower than optimal duration of therapy resulting in less medications being sold. It also increases hospital readmissions, ER visits and puts pressure on other healthcare services resulting in an incorrect perception of therapy inefficacy among patients, physicians, and health systems.
As depicted in the figure below, when we helped a top-5 pharma company deliver a superior experience via a multi-faceted patient support program across therapeutic areas, they witnessed a significant increase in their medicine compliance as well as the drug refill rate, both of which have a positive impact of business outcomes.

Don’t pay the high cost for low customer satisfaction

Poor pharma patient experience has multifold implications. It reduces therapy adherence, drives negative word-of-mouth, causes dissatisfaction, and decreases loyalty, all of which can hurt a pharmaceutical company’s revenue and reputation.
By prioritizing patient experience, they can improve patient outcomes and overall well-being. As a first step, pharma companies need to put themselves in the patient’s shoes, understand their dilemmas and challenges as they go through their treatment journeys, and then deliver tailored patient experience solutions that truly make a difference to patients’ lives.

References:

1.
American Hospital Association. Advancing digital patient engagement [Internet]. 2022 Apr 19. Available from: https://www.aha.org/aha-center-health-innovation-market-scan/2022-04-19-advancing-digital-patient-engagement
2.
IQVIA. Consumer health apps and digital health tools proliferate, improving quality and health outcomes [Internet]. 2021 Jul. Available from: https://www.iqvia.com/newsroom/2021/07/consumer-health-apps-and-digital-health-tools-proliferate-improving-quality-and-health-outcomes-for
3.
Grand View Research. Patient portal market size, share & trends analysis report [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/patient-portal-market
4.
MM+M. Healthcare marketers trend report 2023: a trim off the top [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.mmm-online.com/home/channel/features/healthcare-marketers-trend-report-2023-a-trim-off-the-top/
5.
Kim J, Combs K, Downs J, Tillman III. Medication adherence: The elephant in the room. US Pharm [Internet]. 2018;43(1):30-4. Available from: https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/medication-adherence-the-elephant-in-the-room
6.
Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2013;3:e001570. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570
7.
Salesforce. State of the connected customer. 5th ed. [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.salesforce.com/content/dam/web/en_ie/www/PDF/state-of-connected-customer-fifth-ed-comp.pdf
8.
Vonage. The $62 billion customer service scared away infographic [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.vonage.co.uk/resources/articles/the-62-billion-customer-service-scared-away-infographic/

Share this blog

    Get exclusive pharma
    insights delivered to your inbox

    Latest

    Latest

      Let's Partner to Commercialize with Confidence

      Powered by Onetrust